Podcasting and RSS the Importance of the RSS Feed

In the evolving landscape of podcasting, one technology remains a constant linchpin—RSS (Really Simple Syndication). Despite its pivotal role, a growing number of podcasters and their teams lack a fundamental understanding of RSS and its significance. This knowledge gap presents risks that could impact the openness and accessibility of podcasting itself.

Understanding RSS

RSS is essentially a web feed that allows syndication platforms like Apple Podcast to access updates to online content in a standardized format. For podcasters, an RSS feed is like the broadcast signal for your podcast, syndicating your episodes to various platforms when they pull your feed.

RSS is Expanding with Podcasting 2.0

The Podcasting 2.0 initiative aims to enhance the capabilities of podcasting through the evolution of the RSS feed. This includes:

  • Enhanced metadata to include more detailed episode information.
  • New tags to support features like transcripts, funding links, and chapters.
  • Decentralized control to keep podcasting free from monopolistic control by any single entity.

Why Open RSS is Essential

Open RSS ensures that no one company, whether Spotify, YouTube, or any other media giant, can monopolize podcasting. Here’s why this matters:

  • Freedom and Flexibility: Open RSS allows you to publish your podcast anywhere and ensures your content is accessible across multiple platforms.
  • Ownership and Control: You retain ownership of your content and the syndication channels, avoiding the risk of having your content locked into proprietary platforms.
  • Innovation: Open standards foster innovation by allowing the entire community to contribute to and benefit from new features and improvements as happening with Podcasting 2.0

The Risks of Platform Dependency

Focusing solely on platforms like Spotify or YouTube can be incredibly risky for several reasons:

  • Limited Reach: Dependence on a single platform limits your audience potential.
  • Vulnerability: Changes in platform policies or algorithms can negatively impact your podcast’s visibility and accessibility. Spotify and YouTube are well known for censoring and deplatforming podcasts.
  • Data Control: Proprietary platforms often control listener data, preventing you from gaining valuable insights into your audience. They instead market to your podcasters.

Educate Yourself on RSS

The decline in RSS knowledge is concerning. Here’s what you can do:

  • Learn the Basics: Understand how Podcast RSS feeds work and how to manage your feed.
  • Stay Updated: Keep up with developments in the Podcasting 2.0 initiative.
  • Utilize Resources: Leverage tutorials, forums, and communities dedicated to open podcasting.

Why Podcasters Should Think Twice Before Trusting Spotify

In recent years, Spotify has become a significant player in the podcasting world, enticing podcasters with promises of vast audiences. However, beneath the surface lies a concerning reality that podcasters should not ignore. By placing too much trust in Spotify, podcasters inadvertently compromise their listeners’ privacy and sell out their audience’s data for little to no return. This is a problem that every podcaster needs to be aware of.

Considerations of Being on Spotify

Audience Privacy? Nonexistent

First and foremost, Spotify’s approach to user data is apparent. Read their terms of service and privacy policy. We have provided you with a summary below. When listeners tune into your podcast on Spotify, their preferences, including their listening habits, sexual and political choices by your listener’s listening habits, and even personal details provided by your account signup, are used for marketing to your listeners. As a podcaster, you should ask if you are responsible for protecting your audience’s privacy.

Open Podcasting through open RSS was designed so that audience members were not spied upon and their privacy was religiously protected. You inadvertently expose them to their marketing machine on the back of your content by distributing it on Spotify.

Marketing to Your Audience Without Your Benefit

Spotify’s business model is heavily reliant on advertising. When your listeners are on Spotify, they are constantly being marketed to. The worst part? The majority of podcasters earn zero from these ads. Spotify reaps all the benefits while you’re left out in the cold. Your hard-earned audience is being monetized, but you see no profits.

Re-marketing Using Your Audience’s Data

It gets worse. Spotify not only markets to your audience, but they also re-market to them using the data they’ve collected. This means your listeners are targeted repeatedly with ads while Spotify continues to grow its profits. Meanwhile, you, the content creator, receive nothing in return for the data Spotify accumulates from your audience.

Unfair Compensation for Artists

The issue of payment isn’t limited to podcasters alone. Music artists who receive meager compensation have long criticized Spotify’s payment model. If Spotify can underpay music artists who generate billions of streams, what makes you think podcasters will fare any better?

The Suppression of RSS Feeds

Spotify’s desire to control the podcasting landscape is evident in its approach to RSS feeds. By default, Spotify does not distribute podcasts via RSS feeds unless explicitly activated. This move is aimed at repressing the open podcasting ecosystem. Spotify owns Chartable and formerly owned Podsights, now rolled into Megaphone. By controlling these tools, Spotify can take all the IP data from those services and target your listeners without you seeing a dime.

The Consequences of Selling Out Your Listeners

By placing your trust in Spotify, you essentially agree to a one-sided relationship where Spotify holds all the power and reaps all the rewards. Your listeners’ privacy is compromised, their data is exploited, and their loyalty to you is taken advantage of—all for the benefit of a platform that gives little back to the content creators who make it successful.

It’s time for podcasters to think critically about the platforms they choose to host their content. While the allure of Spotify’s vast audience is tempting, the cost of compromising your listeners’ privacy and selling out their data is too high. Podcasters must prioritize ethical practices and consider alternative platforms that respect creators and audiences.

In conclusion, don’t sell out your listeners’ privacy for the short-term gains Spotify promises. Look for platforms that value your content, respect your audience’s privacy, and offer fair compensation for your hard work. Your listeners deserve better, and so do you.

Privacy Policy Summary:

Please Review the Official Spotify Privacy Policy for an updated and complete policy statement.

1. Data Collection

Spotify collects various types of personal data:

  • User Data: Includes profile name, email address, password, phone number, date of birth, gender, street address, country, and university/college for student plans. This data is collected when you sign up or update your account.
  • Street Address Data: Used for checking service eligibility, legal notices, support options, billing and tax administration, and delivering physical goods.
  • Usage Data: Information about how you use Spotify, such as search queries, streaming history, playlists, interactions with other users, and usage of third-party services and devices.
  • Technical Data: Includes URLs, cookie data, IP addresses, device IDs, network connection type, provider, browser type, language, operating system, and Spotify application version.
  • General Location: Derived from your IP address or device settings, used to meet geographic requirements and deliver relevant content and ads.
  • Device Sensor Data: Motion or orientation data from your device, used to provide certain features.

2. Purpose of Data Use

Spotify uses your personal data for the following purposes:

  • Personalization: Tailoring your user experience, including content recommendations and ads.
  • Service Provision: Ensuring the functionality of the Spotify Service, including streaming, customer support, and community interactions.
  • Communication: Sending marketing communications, notifications, and customer support messages.
  • Legal Compliance: Meeting legal obligations and responding to lawful requests from authorities.
  • Advertising: Providing tailored advertising based on your usage data and preferences. Users can opt out of tailored advertising in their privacy settings.
  • Business Operations: Supporting business functions such as data analysis, audits, and fraud monitoring.

3. Data Sharing

Spotify may share your data:

  • With Service Providers: To help provide the Spotify Service, such as hosting services, technical support, and marketing.
  • For Legal Reasons: To comply with legal obligations, enforce terms and policies, and respond to lawful requests from authorities.
  • With Business Partners: For tailored advertising and promotions. Business partners may provide Spotify with information about your interests.
  • During Business Transfers: In the event of a merger, sale, or transfer of assets, your data may be transferred to the new entity.

4. Data Retention

Spotify retains personal data as long as necessary to provide the Spotify Service and for legitimate and essential business purposes, such as maintaining the performance of the Spotify Service, making data-driven business decisions, and complying with legal obligations.

5. Data Security

Spotify implements appropriate technical and organizational measures to protect personal data from unauthorized access, loss, and misuse.

6. Data Transfer

Spotify may transfer your personal data to other countries, ensuring adequate protection as required by applicable data protection laws.

7. User Rights

Users have rights regarding their personal data, including:

  • Access: Request a copy of personal data.
  • Correction: Request amendments to inaccurate data.
  • Deletion: Request deletion of personal data under certain conditions.
  • Opt-out of Tailored Advertising: Opt-out of the use of data for tailored advertising.
  • Data Portability: Request a copy of personal data in a portable format.
  • Withdraw Consent: Withdraw consent for data processing where consent is the legal basis.

8. Children’s Privacy

Spotify’s services are not directed to children under 13 years old. For users in California, the age is 16. Spotify does not knowingly collect personal data from children without parental consent.

9. Changes to the Policy

Spotify may update its Privacy Policy from time to time. Users will be notified of significant changes through the Spotify Service or other means.

10. Contact Information

For any questions or concerns about the Privacy Policy, users can contact Spotify through the provided contact details in the policy.

Terms of Service Summary:

We also reviewed their Terms of Service and have highlighted the most critical elements below. Please review their official Terms of Service, as they can update their policy anytime.

Spotify’s Terms of Service, effective as of March 24, 2023, outline how they may use user data primarily through their Privacy Policy and related provisions. Here are the key points regarding user data usage:

  1. Privacy Policy: The use of the Spotify Service is subject to the Spotify Privacy Policy, which details how user data is collected, used, shared, and protected. By using Spotify, users agree to this Privacy Policy.
  2. User Content: Users retain ownership of the content they post on Spotify but grant Spotify a non-exclusive, transferable, sublicensable, royalty-free, fully paid, irrevocable, worldwide license to use, reproduce, make available, perform, display, translate, modify, create derivative works from, distribute, and otherwise utilize the User Content. This allows Spotify to operate and provide its services.
  3. Device Usage: Users grant Spotify the right to use the processor, bandwidth, and storage hardware on their devices to facilitate the operation of the Spotify Service. This includes providing advertising and other information to users and allowing Spotify’s business partners to do the same.
  4. Advertising and Promotions: Spotify may provide advertising and other promotional messages within the content, which may be influenced by commercial considerations, including agreements with third parties.
  5. Third-Party Integrations: Spotify Service may interact with third-party applications, websites, and devices. Users’ data might be subject to additional terms and conditions provided by these third parties.
  6. Monitoring and Removal of User Content: Spotify may monitor and review user content but is not obligated to do so. It reserves the right to remove or disable access to any user content for any reason.
  7. Licenses and Permissions: Users grant Spotify permission to use their data as necessary to provide the Spotify Service, which includes modifying and distributing user content, providing personalized services, and ensuring the functionality of third-party integrations.

In summary, Spotify can use user data to provide and improve its services, display advertising, integrate with third-party services, and manage user content. All these uses are governed by the Spotify Privacy Policy, which should be reviewed for detailed information on data handling

How did Acast get 35 Million Dollars?

It continues to be shocking what investors fall for when it comes to investing in companies.  Acast had a Series C investment of 35 million. Yet the Acast numbers tell another story. Using feed analysis data provided by Daniel J Lewis the following tells an eye-raising story of what Acast has going on with the small number of shows they have.

Acast Stats
2.4K podcasts (0.4%) of Global Listings in Apple Podcasts
1.3K active podcasts (52.9%) have published an episode in 90 days.
1.1K inactive podcasts (47.1%) have not published an episode in 90 days
186 with 3 or fewer episodes (7.8%)
444 with 4–9 episodes (18.7%)
1.0K with 10–50 episodes (43.4%)
713 with 51 or more episodes (30.1%)
1.1K point to podcast page on media host (48.2%)

Yet they only had 2 million in revenue and now 155 million pre-money valuation. If you compare that to Libsyns numbers and revenue Libsyn reports Libsyn should have a market cap of around 3 billion which is a pipe dream as well.

Libsyn Stats
40.9k podcasts
25.3k active podcasts (62.0%)
15.5k inactive podcasts (38.0%)
3.3k with 3 or fewer episodes (8.1%)
6.5k with 4–9 episodes (15.9%)
18.2k with 10–50 episodes (44.5%)
12.9k with 51 or more episodes (31.6%)
18.3k point to podcast page on media host (44.9%)

This is not going to end well for the investors at Acast in our opinion.

Some Shocking Statistics

Daniel J. Lewis of The Audacity to Podcast has been doing some deep diving on numbers in the podcasting space looking specifically at shows in Apple Podcasts through their API and have come up with some stats that are absolute gold.  See more stats here.

Total Feeds
Almost 609K total podcasts in Apple Podcasts.

83K SoundCloud feeds
72k Anchor feeds
50K FeedBurner feeds
40K Libsyn feeds
28.3K Podbean feeds
27K Blubrry / PowerPress feeds
15.1K Spreaker feeds
8.2K Buzzsprout feeds
3.2K Simplecast feeds
2K Libsyn Pro feeds
1.1K podcasts.com feeds
1K Podtrac feeds
600 Fireside feeds

Some Interesting Metrics in relationships to the number of Episodes in the feeds

58K of the Anchor feeds have 10 or fewer episodes.
50K of the SoundCloud feeds have 10 or fewer episodes.
11K of Libsyn feeds have 10 or fewer.
A little more than half of all podcasts in AP have 10 or fewer episodes!
78.5K feeds in AP have only 1 episode!

When Daniel looked at the 3 or fewer episode metric per feed the breakdown even gets more wide-eyed.

42.4K Anchor feeds have 3 or fewer episodes
27.2K for SoundCloud
8.4K for FeedBurner
3.6K for Libsyn
3.3K for Blubrry / PowerPress
158.7K podcasts in all of AP have 3 or fewer episodes.

Overall Stats
263.3K (43.2%) of podcasts haven’t released an episode at all this year.

When Looking at Apple Podcast to see how many shows have the correct link back to there .com here is the breakdown.

-Of the 40.8K Libsyn-domain feeds in Apple Podcasts, more than half have their website properly set to something other than a Libsyn domain. Leaving 18.3K Libsyn-domain feeds pointing to Libsyn-domain websites. But without visiting every web page, that remaining number could contain any split between intentional an accident.

-SoundCloud has 83.3K domain feeds in Apple Podcast, and a smaller-than-I-expected-but-still-big 48.8K of those feeds have a Sound Cloud URL as the website.

-Anchor has 72,169 feeds in AP. All but 3 are pointing back to the podcast’s Anchor webpage and are not a podcast’s own branded website! (Edited by Request DJL)

He also looked at the total number of episodes across all feeds for the following companies an came up with these averages.

SoundCloud: 2,046,816 / average 24.5 episodes per show.
Libsyn: 1,980,221 / average 48.5 episodes per show.
Podbean: 789,113 / average 27.9 episodes per show.
Anchor  631,550 episodes /average of 8.8 episodes per show.
Spreaker: 613,082 / average 40.5 episodes per show.

There are some serious takeaways here we will update this article as he provides more data. Gives you some insight into what is really happening in the podcasting space.

Podcast Awards Nominations

The 12th Annual Podcast Awards nominations open on July 1st.

The 12th annual event is shaping up to be an interesting year with the new site, new rules, and voting process. The changes made by the Podcast Awards committee in response to significant process inequity over the past two or three years are on the surface, appear to prevent virtually handing the win to a group of shows that teamed up for group nominations and group voting. The changes to voting process appear to attempt to level the playing field, and according to the podcast awards rules page restored the spirit of the awards.

With the awards being boycotted by a small number of shows that are part of the Diamond Group due to the rules change, controversy does continue.

“Todd Cochrane the Awards founder said it’s unfortunate what’s happened the last couple of years. He said his reaction following the awards last year was not the best, and to a point, he felt upon review what the Diamond Group did was within the rules, it sure definitely was not in the spirit of the awards. The mocking and off-channel discussions showed a small percentage of the participants were in it for sport.” He goes on to say, “I did not create the awards to have them manipulated, but in hindsight, the committee should have made the changes as soon as I reacquired the awards.  He states the Awards Committee worked really hard to bring equity back to the event”

With the Podcast Awards about two weeks away, it will be interesting to see how the process flushes out.  As has been often by the founder, the awards process is never perfect. You can register all the way through the end of July but remember nominations open on July 1st.